Tmobile Call Center Houston Texas

The Enemy Within "And slay them wherever you find them"

Donís José Català, a fellow with whom I met in battle of words against the arguments of Black Pawns (those individuals who proclaim that the terrorist attacks of 11-M had been a new GAL) has written a book entitled "The fifth invasion : Islam 711-2011 "In which highlights the danger that the ruling fundamentalist radicalism (at least according to what transcends the media) between the followers of the religion of Mohammed finished devouring the condescending and overly indulgent Western democracies.

As it is conceived the book, perhaps capable of restoring reading vision some people would rather keep their eyes blindfolded to the obvious (and as real as the nearly 200 deaths of 11-M) danger of the religious terrorism use the Koran as justification for their indiscriminate killing, but the biased conclusions leads the storyline of the book can make a play dangerous and reckless if not taken into account some issues that are not reflected in the edited text.

That the Koran, as shown in the book, contains teachings and passages inconsistent (and even confronted) with our democracy is more than obvious, it is equally clear that, based on a literal reading of the Koran, the only conclusion possible that one can reach is that Islam is cruel, violent and merciless both believers and non-believers. And in the same way, the conclusion also (as indeed it is concluded in the book) that there can not be a moderate Islam taking the Qur'an as a whole, beyond possible passages humanists (which also exist, although not reflected in the book) used by some currents of Islam that roam freely in our own societies.

The main problem with this whole series of conclusions that could be considered as true if we follow the literal reading of the Koran, is that you can get, as we shall see, the same conclusions regarding literal reading of reference books (the Bible) of any of the other two mainstream monotheistic religions (Judaism and Christianity), therefore, following the storyline of the book, could be declared undemocratic and radical, not too much trouble, the three religions.

Therefore, with respect to the treatment afforded to women and their social status (which is one of the main points discussed in the book) we find citations equivalent in the three religions:

" Men have authority over women
because Allah has made them superior to them.
good women are the truly devout, who guard the intimacy which Allah has ordained to be saved. But for those whose animosity
fear, admonish, and then leave them alone in bed, then pegadles (Quran 4:34).

"But every woman prays or prophesies with her head uncovered dishonors her head: for this is that if she were shaven. For if the woman does not cover, which also cut hair, and if it is disgraceful to women cut their hair or shave, which is covered. For a man should not cover his head, since he is the image and glory of God, but woman is the glory of man "(I Corinthians 11:5-7).

" When you go forth to war against your enemies, and the LORD thy God hath delivered into your hand, and take them captive, and seest among the captives a beautiful woman, and codiciares, and women take to you by , put it in your house, and she shave her head, and pare her nails and remove the clothing of her captivity, and will remain in your house, and bewail her father and her mother a full month, and then you come in unto her, and you be her husband, and she will be your wife "(Deuteronomy 21:10-13).

" your women keep silence in the churches: for they are not allowed to speak, but to be under obedience as also saith the law. And if you want to learn something, let them ask their husbands at home, it is shameful for a woman to speak in church "(I Corinthians 14:34-35). Nor

explicit cruelty to his enemies Qur'an is unique to Islam:

"Judith then approached the bar of the bed that was near the head of Holofernes, picked up his sword away, and going to bed, took him by the hair and said," Strengthen me in this hour, God of Israel !. " After two shots hit him in the neck with all his strength and cut off his head "(Judith 13:6-8).

" fought against Midian, as Yahweh had commanded Moses, and killed every male. And they slew the kings of Midian: Evi, Requem, South, Hur and Reba, five kings were the Midianites. Sword also killed Balaam son of Beer. The children of Israel brought captive the women of Midian and their children and collected their animals, their flocks and all their belongings. They burnt all the villages in which they lived and all their camps. Having collected all the booty and spoils, men and beasts, took the captives and plunder to Moses and Eleazar the priest and the entire community of the children of Israel in the steppes of Moab, which are near the Jordan, at the height Jericho. Moses, Eleazar the priest and all the leaders of the community went to meet up outside the camp. Moses was angry with the commanders of the troops, commanders of thousands and captains of hundreds who were returning from combat. Moses said: "So have you let the women? Indeed they were, following the counsel of Balaam, induced the children of Israel to disobey Yahweh (in the case of Baal-Peor) and a plague struck the LORD community. Kill, then, all male children, and every woman who has had sex with a man. But let live and take for yourselves every girl who still have not had "" (Numbers 31:7-18).

" You too, Ethiopians," Victim of my sword will be them. " He extended his hand against the north, destroy Assyria, and leave Nineveh a desolation, barren as the desert "(Zephaniah 2:12-13).

" Look, I'm going to throw her into the bed of pain, and those who commit adultery with her, a great tribulation, except they repent of their deeds. And their children, I will hurt death "(Revelation 2:22-23).

Nor are unique to Islam the punishment of those who deviate from the Sacred Law (including the crucifixion, the refiner's fire or public lynchings):

" But if it proves to be true that virginity was not found in Young, then bring out the damsel to the door of the house of his father, and shall stone the men of his city, and die, because she hath wrought folly in Israel whore in her father's house, and put away evil from among you "(Deuteronomy 22:20-21).

Other issues addressed in the book to demonstrate the intrinsic evil of Islam are also reflected in other religions, so the early majority of girls in Islam (discussed in the book in reference to pedophilia) is its parallel in Judaism (13 years of age is for boys and for girls), like the Sharia (Islamic law emanating from the Quran) has its counterpart in the Jewish Torah (the law emanating from los cinco primeros libros de la Biblia o Tenakh). Y el terrorismo, por desgracia, también ha sido utilizado por otras religiones en fechas no tan lejanas (el Irgun y el Palmaj lo ejercieron contra los británicos en la década de los 40, siendo el atentado contra el hotel King David de Jerusalén–91 muertos, el 22 de julio de 1946– el más conocido).

Sin embargo, al poner el foco en la literalidad de los libros sagrados del islamismo omitiendo las numerosas equivalencias existentes en el resto de religiones, queda aislado artificialmente el objetivo y queda la vía expedita para denigrar y desacreditar cualquier elemento relacionado con el Islam; evidentemente, si el objetivo del libro era demostrar la intrínseca perversion of Islam did not have to be referred to the intrinsic brutality of the two other monotheistic religions in the majority, but to reach the conclusions reached in the book would require at least a minimum benchmarks to allow the reader to guess that at least any religion, not just Islam, is subject to interpretation at least as evil as those evident in the book about Islam (remember the Inquisition played the same holy books that the present Catholic Church).

Indeed, both Judaism (minor) and Christianity have been introducing changes to their own interpretations theological, having to qualify them and even deny them, to adapt to the societies in which they have been been built, and it is that Islam has the same problem as any other religion, no amendments can be introduced to texts that are immovable, since they contradict or change the word of a supposedly perfect superior being and lead inevitably to the death of one's religion, so that any evolution or adaptation to the social reality of each historical moment can only be implemented through self-interpretation of the word sacred. However, in the book Islam denied any possibility of interpretive evolution, when the reality is that no only that evolution has occurred in other religions, but that currently exist (and live with us) other interpretations of Islam and much less violent sticklers that transcend media.

The inclusion in the book of specific examples of such interpretations of Islam evolved (represented in our country for the most diverse Islamic societies) become a sort of witch hunt for incorporating in its ranks some particular individuals who have completed being formally charged with collaboration or even integration with Islamist terrorism, the previously determined that moderate Islam does not exist, uses these individuals (and by extension to partnerships which were built) to confirm. That confirmation of the radical Islamist association based on the existence of any terrorists in their ranks is entirely superficial, as it posits that the association was aware of terrorist activities and for a specific individual who knowingly received him with open arms, while the terrorist just passing by and came to the call of the association, which is far presume.

The next step leads inevitably to public administrations and governments, who are accused of financing Islamic terrorism to provide grants to Islamic societies, have been terrorists in their ranks or not (because, remember, has already been established previously that moderate Islam does not exist, or what is ultimately the same, that Islam equals terrorism), the book closes, therefore, the gateway to the promotion of Islamic religion is more in line with the values \u200b\u200bof our democracies.

At this point, we review every door that closes the book by declaring that moderate Islam does not exist:

• Islam does not evolve as they have done as Judaism or Christianity, since it is an inherently evil religion .
• associations are moderate Islamists, since there is no moderate Islam.
• Islamist associations could not be enforced by the State, since it would promote Islamic terrorism.

The big question that we can do is: So, what we do with who declares himself a follower of Islam? If we know that that means it is inherently evil (the only thing that has been able to learn of that religion), which is moderate but it may seem and can not be helped by the State since it is a potential terrorist ... the final solution seems clear, is not it?.

Ultimately, and without denying the reality presented in the book (that Islamist terrorism is a serious threat to our democracy and that current interpretations of Islam are an endless source of terrorists, even to the public and with impunity justify the motivations of mass murder), the conclusions you reach are dangerous and reckless as it only leaves the door open to those who do not want to give up their religion.

Maybe (just maybe) looking back at our history (including the latest, when adultery and homosexuality were not only for Christians sin, a crime for all the English) the conclusions would have been very different and had come to light the real problem of all religions before the law imposing medieval societies they left behind long ago catapults and armor can only become illuminated in feudal subjugation of the day, be it Muslim, Jew or Christian.

Note on title: The title of this article is part of the Qur'an Sura 4:91, which talks about how to act towards non-believers " want to live in peace with you [believers ] and his own people "but did not stay out or not offered to submit.

PD: The book "The fifth invasion : 711-2011 Islam "can be purchased for less than 4 € in digital format (PDF or ePub), now also available in any bookstore for about 13 €.

Female Genitale Tatoos

"Privileges or rights?

the drivers have finished out of control he had to recognize their own spokesman USCA (Union of Air Traffic Controllers Association) the same Friday in which, for the first time in the history of Spain, English airspace was completely closed by a sudden pandemic that affected only that group, so much so out of control that even had to be called to go to their jobs by the union itself .

Although another article at this point in the film (with the out of control under the supervision, control and military courts), criticizing the performance of air traffic controllers may appear to be intended to make firewood from a fallen tree (nearly 500 air traffic controllers face an ordeal of records, claims and lawsuits, including requests for prison sentences for their actions), the fact is that the issue still deserves some comment by another intense collective attempts to explain air traffic controllers, especially through Internet , a performance almost impossible explanation.

First, a prior question is perfectly legitimate to use all means available to workers to try not to lose the rights that have been conquered with great effort. However, it seems that the drivers refuse to lose can be treated as rights, but rather a series of privileges that they have been commissioned to transform unsustainable after you use and abuse of them completely fraudulent.

Cristina Anton, an air traffic controller in Palma de Mallorca, wrote last Saturday, an angry and unfortunate article entitled " to see if we understand " that began with the phrase " instead of reading the newspapers paid by the government reads the Gazette, there is everything and then decide what you believe and what not ."

Indeed, in the Official Gazette can find almost everything, just not what this controller is intended to find (his particular truth), but on the contrary, it is sufficient to read, for example, the literalness of the first eight paragraphs the Preamble of the Law 9 / 2010 in the Official Gazette published 15 April this year, although this was the most direct regulations (and the source of the current situation), it was the first who tried to tackle the institutionalized abuses through that I Collective Agreement 1999 which is cited in the Preamble. And the government of José María Aznar, in its final (February 2004), tried it, but putting it as an excuse two European Directives, integrating air traffic controllers within the groups affected by legislation on Special Days to Working through an amendment of Royal Decree 1561/1995 ; the exclusion of air traffic controllers for the general guidelines established in the Statute of Workers (" that subsection is now" Transport and aerial work "to encompass all activities related to civil aviation and transport not only as far happening, "he said in the Explanatory Memorandum to the Royal Decree 294/2004) does not appear that had the effects intended.

If we consult the source of conflict (the First Collective Agreement between AENA and the group of Air Traffic Controllers, published in the Official Gazette of March 18, 1999 ) we can see how the annual base salary was established from a minimum of 17,000 € and a maximum of 43,000 €, which complements (applicable to all drivers) were between 36,000 € and 91,000 € (excluding bonuses and allowances for transportation); we will find the maximum working hours (1,200 hours per year), special paid leave (RSI) and other working conditions that Law 9 / 2010 calls into question for being an intolerable burden to ensure the proper functioning of the English air traffic.

The truth is that except for a couple of issues (the aforementioned LER and ineptitude that has occurred, both repealed by Law 9 / 2010), the collective agreement contains a number of workers' demands difficult to achieve in any other sector, as self-regulation shifts the determination of the needs of new staff, reduced working hours with breaks included (up to 120 monthly hours including breaks of 33% to 50% of the day, which is 6 hours a day, between 3 and 4 hours breaks discounted cash-working 5 days a week) and a high salary, even when set to the responsibility of job, from this starting point, it is understandable that some air traffic controllers, such as that Cristina Anton, see his actions as a fight to regain their rights and their professional and personal dignity. And from that starting point, some might be argued by other workers who do not enjoy the same working conditions.

However, although theory of the written text of the Collective Agreement be any apparent A delegation of responsibilities of the public company AENA in one of his groups of workers, in practice what has happened is that these workers have been used fraudulently to convert rights into privileges unsustainable, so that what should be a demonstration of responsibility of workers is over becoming a great example of irresponsibility and, more worryingly, in a rebuttal argument on the dangers difficult to stop writing and in the hands of workers is not just any kind of responsibility in the internal organization of any company, but even the very negotiation of other agreements, thus putting into question the very nature of collective bargaining.

Some air traffic controller could say that this is not true and it is an opinion based on the arguments of a single party (the public company AENA and the Government), but the truth is that not only is no direct evidence to that effect (labor costs shot out of the amounts set forth in the Collective Agreement itself) but there is even air traffic controllers have confirmed in writing the uses and abuses of those rights, as Francisco Capella, who has already devoted an article a few months ago .

frauds repeatedly used by air traffic controllers were multiple, each one more rude and always in very short-term benefit of their own pockets. From using sick leave as a means to strike (and not lose the salary of each day of the strike and also accounted for the full day to add hours to the annual limit of 1,200) to inflate the number of drivers needed on each shift, remember that shifts are organizing themselves-the so exhausted before the limit of 1,200 hours per year and collect overtime excesses, through the reinterpretation of time to establish effective working volunteer hours that were paid even beyond the extraordinary or restricting the entry of new staff in order to keep their income artificially. And all this from the pocket of the English and through arrangements or agreements with the public company AENA who remained outside the collective agreement in order to escape the budgetary control of personnel required fees charged by the State Budget.

Thus, the 505 million euros in personnel costs AENA in 2000 to 1.207 million spent in 2009 (an increase of 149%), while the number of workers increased from 9,242 to 13,143 (an increase of 42%) during the same period of time and Controller from 1661 to 2404 (an increase of almost 45%), the gap between the increase in the workforce and the remuneration is denouncing the General Comptroller of the State Administration since at least 2002, as stated in the Preamble of the Act cited 9 / 2010, and whose cause is from the uncontrolled use of voluntary overtime and by the group of air traffic controllers. In round figures, the 1,661 drivers in 2000 cost 150 million euros (30% of staff costs AENA), while 2404, 2009 drivers were nearly 800 million euros in public funds (66% of personnel costs AENA) would not be bad that belied air traffic controllers or at least explain his version of these figures, since accounting AENA is a public official and those numbers have continued since long before the start of the current conflict.

Of course, there is much slippage in wages, no one in their right mind would use that argument to squeeze until exhaustion at a professional that thousands of lives depend on every shift you make, and this is the most public (if not only) that wield the air traffic controllers when arguing in its favor, the problem is that this argument has become, thanks to the abuse that have made it their own air traffic controllers, little or no credible and even less if the real time work-rest-minus was 3 or 4 hours a day (between 60 and 80 hours per month) and what has forced it to play a real working time of between 80 and 107 hours per month, from 4 to 5 hours and a half day-(do not forget that real time work of a worker to shift to other sectors -at 21 and 7 working days of rest, is between 168 to 192 hours per month, with the right to break of 15 minutes). It seems, therefore, that a reduction effective working between 44% and 54% the rest of shift workers is put at risk the safety of passengers, let alone the health of themselves air traffic controllers, but rather the opposite.

The discrediting of content, which air traffic controllers, despite their efforts, increases each time they show the statements of a driver or a family member trying to explain how the Royal Decree on Friday led to all air traffic controllers templates Spain even vomit in the corners of the control towers (explanation given in the Cadena SER on Monday evening by the wife of a driver), being in any case of facts very little credibility if not a real insult to the intelligence of other citizens.

Despite all these critical to air traffic controllers, they can not be dispensed with other data that would support his thesis (which is not timely performance of this last bridge), and that the public company AENA blamed its losses in recent years (165 million euros in 2008 353 in 2009) to high labor costs of air traffic controllers (this is the mantra we hear all companies: labor costs are the only expenses that are unacceptable to maintain the viability of business), ignoring the fact that if labor costs are increased by 149% since 2000, external financing has made a 2,570% (from a long-term debts of 380 million has gone to 10,143 millones del último ejercicio) y los gastos financieros se han incrementado en un 4.267%, pasando de los 6 millones del año 2000 a los 284 de 2009. Igual que tampoco hay que olvidar que el Convenio Colectivo fue aceptado por la empresa en 1999 y firmado por sus entonces responsables, por lo que las responsabilidades sobre el descontrol de los sueldos de los controladores aéreos no habría que buscarlas sólo entre los trabajadores, sino también entre los dirigentes políticos que se encontraban al frente de AENA en aquellos momentos (otra cosa muy distinta sería la negociación para la modificación del Convenio Colectivo, que sí se ha visto imposibilitada por la intransigencia reiterada de USCA a ceder respecto a las nuevas condiciones labor imposed by the current economic crisis).

And all this without forgetting that the air traffic controllers charge of the State Budget and, therefore, should tighten their belts like we did the rest of our fellow citizens, who are the end of the day who would pay their salaries.